--- title: Patent Risk Management and Controlling Patent Litigation Costs description: IPVision early patent case assessments increase ability to mitigate patent risk and provide methods to reduce patent litigation expense. image: https://info.ipvisioninc.com/hs-fs/file-2839894740-png/images/litigation_response_game_theory1.png --- [![logo](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/hs-fs/hubfs/ipvision-site/images/logo.png?width=200&name=logo.png "logo")](http://www.ipvisioninc.com/) - [Contact Us](http://www.ipvisioninc.com/about-us/contact-us/) - [Blog](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/IPVisions) ![IP vision blog banner](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/hs-fs/hubfs/ipvision-site/images/banner_blog-1.jpg?width=1400&name=banner_blog-1.jpg "IP vision blog banner") ## IPVision Blog Written by [Alex Butler](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/author/alex-butler) # Patent Risk Management and Controlling Patent Litigation Costs - [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share) Patent risk profiles of corporations have dramatically shifted given two recent patent litigation dynamics: 1. The rise of patent trolls or NPE's (non-practicing entities) 2. The decline of patent infringement 'notice' letters replaced by direct filing of patent complaints  The first dynamic is economic and includes a range of strategic and financial investors, including for example the well-known [Intellectual Ventures](http://intven.com/), and others such as [Juridica](http://www.juridica.co.uk/) and [Altititude Capital](http://www.altitudecp.com/). These investors and an increasing number of firms see opportunities in the exclusionary rights provided by patents to obtain high-risk / high-reward economic returns. The second dynamic is legal - driven by court decisions that incent patent plaintiffs to file first and negotiate second (the reverse of historical tendencies).  No matter one's opinion of either dynamic, these trends create a need for more robust, information-efficient and effective methods to prepare for, assess and respond to unexpected patent overtures (be they licensing offers or lawsuits). Historically, we have worked with clients to evaluate patent infringement notice letters through structured processes: - Evaluate the economic relevance and risk profile of the claim  - Evaluate the relative availability of 'good' (e.g., potentially patent invalidating) prior art  Clients essentially followed an economics driven patent game theory:  ![patent risk mitigation strategy](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/hs-fs/file-2839894740-png/images/litigation_response_game_theory1.png) Despite efforts to mitigate patent risk through defensive patent aggregation and defensive patent pools, patent litigation risk continues to increase. These increases are so large that some corporations now face a 10-fold increase in patent litigation. With rule-of-thumb' *base-line patent defense expenses starting at $3-5 million per lawsuit*, patent risk management is now a key driver in many companies' financial planning and corporate risk management. To combat this increase, we are now working with corporations and outside counsel to develop and implement more robust processes to proactively craft [early case assessment procedures](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/project-services/patent-litigation-early-case-assessment/). These procedures compliment efforts to develop standing litigation response teams, often including both inside and outside counsel, who can avoid many of the initial expenses and time-delays inherent in traditional litigation response efforts.  Shifting from reactive patent risk management to proactive patent risk management is a key strategy driver made available by evidence-based IP insights and patent analytics that quickly (and cost-effectively) provide insights into the merits and potential response(s) to the alleged patent infringement. Crafting an evidence-based approach to patent litigation defense provides corporate patent counsel with unique abilities to **reduce patent risk**, **increase control, **and to** more effectively communicate financial costs **for patent dispute resolution. The early case assessment process arms corporate counsel and the litigation response team with answers to (or at least initial insights into) core questions including: - Are all relevant patent rights controlled by the plaintiff disclosed? - Are there any critical patent quality defects, such as poor claims construction, inequitable conduct, improper disclosures, title decencies or inventorship? - What is the anticipated level of prior art available for patent reexamination or invalidation efforts? - How can we best develop our case strategy -- and get the most effective return from our legal and technical experts? These proactive patent litigation / patent risk resolution requirements are essentially a shift in initial planning from the first weeks of the dispute to the first 48-72 hours. With a moderate shift in effort and sound processes, corporate executives and their patent counsel will be armed with a higher level of information in context and will be able to navigate to faster dispute and risk resolution. **The key take-away is to have an in-place process and method to assess and respond to patent notice letters, patent assertions and lawsuits -- including considering how you [screen "patent offers"](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/project-services/patent-screening/) for sale and to develop [strategies for early assessments of patent lawsuits](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/project-services/patent-litigation-early-case-assessment/). ** In the end, a minor investment in creating or aligning proactive patent defense and patent risk management processes with corporate risk management strategy will generate exponential payoff over time.   Categories: [Patent Strategy](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-strategy), [Patent Analysis](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-analysis), [Patent Litigation](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-litigation) - [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share) ### Follow IPVision - [**](https://www.linkedin.com/company/381481?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A381481%2Cidx%3A2-4-5%2CtarId%3A1457382100602%2Ctas%3Aipvision) - [**](https://twitter.com/ipvisioninc) ### Subscribe via Email ![landscape-map.png](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/hs-fs/hubfs/ipvision-site/images/landscape-map.png?width=103&name=landscape-map.png "landscape-map.png") ### Create a patent landscape map Patent citation analysis that makes it simple to explore complex relationships with a visual guide [Learn More](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/view-patent-landscape-map) ### Categories - [Acquisition Programs (4)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/acquisition-programs) - [Advantage Dashboard (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/advantage-dashboard) - [Boards of Directors (9)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/boards-of-directors) - [Corporate Venture (4)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/corporate-venture) - [COVID-19 (8)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/covid-19) - [Disruptive Innovation (13)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/disruptive-innovation) - [Entrepreneurship (2)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/entrepreneurship) - [Industry Study (2)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/industry-study) - [Innovation (27)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/innovation) - [Intellectual Ventures (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/intellectual-ventures) - [Interval Research (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/interval-research) - [IP Innovation (11)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ip-innovation) - [IP Investment (6)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ip-investment) - [IP Management (8)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ip-management) - [IP Monetization (9)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ip-monetization) - [IP Research (6)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ip-research) - [IPO (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ipo) - [IPVision News (13)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ipvision-news) - [IPVision Update (9)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ipvision-update) - [IV (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/iv) - [Lemelson-MIT Program (15)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/lemelson-mit-program) - [M&A (16)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/ma) - [MIT (7)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/mit) - [National Science Foundation (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/national-science-foundation) - [Patent Analysis (59)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-analysis) - [Patent Assertion Entities (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-assertion-entities) - [Patent Benchmarks (4)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-benchmarks) - [patent claims analysis (5)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-claims-analysis) - [Patent Context (3)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-context) - [Patent Cost (10)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-cost) - [Patent Landscape (42)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-landscape) - [Patent Litigation (18)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-litigation) - [Patent Management Process (5)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-management-process) - [Patent News (48)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-news) - [Patent Pending (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-pending) - [Patent Review Committee (4)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-review-committee) - [Patent Rosetta Stone (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-rosetta-stone) - [Patent Search (2)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-search) - [Patent Software (2)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-software) - [Patent Strategy (50)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-strategy) - [Patent Trafficking (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patent-trafficking) - [Patents (8)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/patents) - [R&D (7)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/rd) - [Research-in-Motion (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/research-in-motion) - [Smart Technologies (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/smart-technologies) - [Supreme Court (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/supreme-court) - [Technology Commercialzation (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/technology-commercialzation) - [Technology Landscape (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/technology-landscape) - [Technology Review (2)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/technology-review) - [Technology Transfer (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/technology-transfer) - [Time Horizons (1)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/time-horizons) - [US Patent System (4)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/us-patent-system) - [Venture Capital (6)](https://info.ipvisioninc.com/blog/topic/venture-capital) ### Recent Posts ###### IPVision, Inc.  800 South Street, Suite 350 Waltham, MA 02453 P 1 (617) 475-6000 F 1 (617) 475-6001 E [info@ipvisioninc.com](mailto:info@ipvisioninc.com) Copyright 2021 IPVision, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  [Privacy Policy](http://www.ipvisioninc.com/privacy-policy/) | [Terms of Use ](http://www.ipvisioninc.com/terms-of-use/) Website designed and developed by  [RainCastle Communications, Inc.](http://www.raincastle.com/industry-consulting-professional-services/) - [**](https://www.linkedin.com/company/381481?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A381481%2Cidx%3A2-4-5%2CtarId%3A1457382100602%2Ctas%3Aipvision) - [**](https://twitter.com/ipvisioninc) ![](https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/viewthroughconversion/923613572/?value=0&guid=ON&script=0)